Merrill Lynch 2001 Complete Broker Comments1
A
(Technology) “Lagging behind other firms on the
street.”
B
(Hiring/recruiting) “We’re in a hiring freeze right now so
nothing’s happening in that area.” (Account statements)
“There’s so much information on those statements that
someone who’s not a sophisticated investor can get lost trying to
read it. The firm offers a total platform for both institutional and
private client and we’re the only ones that do that. That’s
what we do best. However, from a marketing point of view, when it comes
to having people understand what we do, or our branding, it’s
poor.”
C
(Sales support): “We get all the help we need when we need from
operations. Our overall focus and strategy is our strong point, as well
as the freedom from any pressure whatsoever. We could use more sales
assistants at the branch level and better technology.”
D
(Hiring/recruiting) “We’re in a hiring freeze right now,
but even before that I don’t think they made a concentrated
effort to go out and get highly qualified advisors.” (Training)
“There’s a lot of training but most of it is redundant. I
think we could step up some of our training efforts.”
(Operations) “We’re so spread out we end up with
operational issues every now and then that are difficult to get sorted
out.” (Fixed income) “Depends on which day I’m
asked.” (Overall) “The firm is great with high net worth
wealth management and that’s a big plus, but with individuals who
are not in that range, the firm doesn’t target them as much. All
of our marketing has to be approved throughout the firm and we’re
not supported financially if it’s within a lower
range.”
E
“General ratings in the fives and up means it’s average. I
don’t love ‘em, I don’t hate ‘em. Could be
better, could be worse. Our strength is in our name
recognition.”
F
(Freedom) “A year ago I would have said ‘1.’ There
has been some pressure but it’s starting to lighten up.”
(Hiring/recruiting) “There’s such a variance in
quality.” (Training) “There’s some training but the
quality of the training program is lacking. Even as a trainee, many
years ago, I felt they could have been done a better job of making
brokers more sophisticated and professional.” (Operations)
“It’s a mixed bag because you also have to deal with
compliance. Firm has gotten very compliance oriented, almost to a
fault. It’s not very efficient, it bogs down the broker and slows
down what we do.” (Account statements) “Have gotten
feedback from clients who tell me there’s too much information
cluttering the statements. It’s repetitive and confusing.”
(Ethics) “Ethics? I question the ethics of Wall Street as a
whole.” (Image) “This firm has always had a good
reputation.” (Overall) “We have strong marketing and
advertising, our technology has improved somewhat. On the down side I
think we’re a little too regimented without enough
flexibility.”
G
(Sales ideas) “They’re mediocre, I don’t use them at
all.” (Overall) “Our firm’s integrity is excellent.
We have high quality, wonderful people helping us and providing all the
support we need. There is virtually no product push on us. If
we’re weak in anything it’s technology. It needs a lot of
work. They would do well to listen to the field people in terms of
what’s happening. I guess it’s the nature of the beast
after getting so big.”
H
(Hiring/recruiting) “It’s mediocre. We could do a better
job in hiring. As a trainer, I’m sensitive to what I’m
given to work with. (Focus) “I think they pretty much have that
figured out. Their strategy is built on long-range planning, fee base
business, annuitized type business. I really agree with that.”
(Ethics) “Very ethical, almost to the excruciating stage. (Image)
“We have a good brand, good identity in the marketplace, probably
better than most. (Overall) “We genuinely have our client’s
best interests at heart. The firm is extremely focused on what’s
right for the clients. That’s good, but sometimes it can be so
detailed, making sure every “i” is dotted not once, but 10
times, that it gets to be tedious. Our technology is our soft spot as
well as the trend towards continuing education.”
I
(Hiring/recruiting) “I gave it a 7 if it wasn’t good
quality I’d have given it a 3.” (Sales assistants)
“We’re in a hiring freeze right now, in all
departments.” (Overall) “We set the standards for the other
firms. As we go, so goes the rest of the industry, so we have a jump on
everyone else as far as the way this business is going. Merrill spends
time and money on research and technology and is always ahead of the
curve. The quality of our financial counselors is higher than the rest
of the street. I suppose our sales support back office could be
improved, such as in corporate stuff and the municipal desk. With so
many cut backs it’s not even worth calling the back office
because most of the time they don’t know anything.”
J
“Working here 30 years, I think we excel in most areas, our
image, the availability of products, support, and quality of
individuals working here.”
K
“I’ve been here 22 years. I couldn’t imagine working
anywhere else.”
L
“I think Merrill Lynch has a real good grasp of the wealth
management business and a good strategic plan.”
M
“It’s hard working for a leader. You expect the bar to be
higher at Merrill Lynch—what they expect of you. But that’s
OK.”
N
“The quote and information system is poor in terms of its
performance and in terms of how often it works. Even so, this is a
great firm to work for; we're the best firm on the street.”
O
“With a large company like ours, [its] occasionally not as
responsive as a small firm would be. But they have so much more to
offer here a wealth of opportunities that allows me in the direction I
want to go with my business. I think the direction the firm is going,
with the change in management, is good. We're focusing on high net
worth individuals. That's where it's at--managed money and private
portfolios is the future of the business.”
P
“The firm made a mistake in not beating Schwab to the punch and
buying out Northern Trust. They dropped the ball there. To buy Northern
Trust out would have been great. Instead, we're trying to build our own
trust company and it's taking too long.”
Q
“Launny Steffens was the head of the private client group, and
now he's being encouraged to leave. [Stanley] O'Neal will probably take
over that spot. These people are from outside our industry. O'Neal was
originally a controller with GM. He didn't start out as a broker, cold
calling. So the people taking over leadership of the company have never
been in the trenches, and I think that's a mistake. It's better to have
someone running things who's been in the brokerage industry a long
time.”
R
“Our primary platform is second to none. Our product offerings
are great. But our research could be more timely.”
S
“It's a great firm to start working at from day one. They set
high benchmarks for you. From a service standpoint, they have all the
tools to service the high net-worth individual. The commissions and
payouts are lower, but they've recently come out with a simpler payout
schedule, easier to understand than the old.”
T
“Our relationships with corporate clients hinder our research
objectivity. Our research department may know something is not right
with a company and not tell us simply because there's some banking
relationship that the firm has with the company. I wish they could
change that and become more objective.”
U
“The benefits are good and they give you the flexibility to work
your own hours. But the firm has a lower payout than other firms. We
have exceptional sales assistants here. They're all registered, which
is unheard of. And we feel we have the best account statements in the
business.”
V
“There's been a lot of management changes lately. But the top
leadership at the firm, their long-term vision of where the firm is
going, is great. They see things before the rest of the industry sees
it. For example, we were making cutbacks before other firms started
doing that and watching our bottom line.”
W
“We're undergoing a lot of changes. We're evolving into financial
planning as opposed to transactional and along with that there's market
turmoil. Because of the changes, we need a different platform, no
quotas, just evaluation by performance on assets and amount of fees
generated.”
X
“The firm is moving us away from transactional into fee-based.
It's difficult to do. There's pressure. If you've been in business for
a while, you don't want to do it. Maybe they're right. I've been in the
business 12-13 years. Some clients want to trade. The firm has no
problem with you trading if it's in a fee based account. I don't think
we'll discourage that business. The firm is pushing us away from
smaller accounts. You tend to resist that, too. We don't get paid for
accounts under $100,000. First it was $25,000 that didn't pay. I
wouldn't be surprised if they take it to $250,000. We resist this--
first because it's not the way we were taught. We were taught to go for
everybody, take anyone who comes in the door. It's very rough in this
market. Now we have clients who had over $100,000 last year and their
accounts are down. We'd like to help them but we don't get paid. This
is roughest market since ‘72 or ‘73.”
Y
(Image) “The firm is doing well to insure that we're happy and
too appealing to the public. Overall they're trying to do a good job.
(Sales Assistants) “I think we need some work as far as sales
assistants are concerned. [Like what?] Better training. (Quotas)
“Our quotas are a little high in comparisons to others.
Expectations [of the firm] are a little high. That could be modified a
little.”
Z
“I think Merrill Lynch does a great job of training and takes the
high road as far as ethics is concerned. Each of us runs his business
as he sees fit.”
AA
“There's not a lot of pressure to sell certain products, no
pushing of Merrill Lynch funds. The pressure is to build an annuitized
book. It's as though they'd said, ‘Here's your business –
build it the way you want to.’ But sales quotas with the market
the way it is very high; they increased the hurdles in a bear
market!” (Sales assistants) “The sales assistants were
overworked before. There's not enough of them because of cutbacks. I'm
in a small market office, which is about to be closed because of
cutbacks. There's a move afoot to consolidate into larger offices. My
clients don't want to drive to the city. What I'll do is set up at the
country club here and meet with clients.”
AB
“Very happy here, love Merrill Lynch. It's a great
firm.”
AC
“I think Merrill Lynch is usually on the cutting edge, ahead of
change, always anticipates which way things are going to go. It's
proactive rather than reactive.”
AD
“What’s good about working at ML? I particularly like the
company’s focus of the high net worth. We’re moving more
toward the Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs model. We haven’t
reached those levels yet, but hopefully that’s what we’ll
turn into.”
AE
(Research) “Content is excellent but accessibility is bad. Too
slow.” (Why firm is good to work for) “I have the support I
need, the services and products I need. I get the direction I need.
(What’s firm doing better than others?) I think our strategic
initiatives, starting with planning and goal setting for client’s
objectives is the right place to start. The focus is in the right
place. Goal achievement as opposed to just selling stocks and bonds. We
have the tools to do it with and the high net worth clients provide the
best opportunity to do that with.”
AF
“What can ML do better? Really nothing. This is a great place to
work.”
AG
“What’s good about working at ML? The caliber of the
consultants and the perceived value added. You’re either real
happy here or not at all. We have a tight, well-run ship. I feel very
fortunate. They do anything to keep me happy because I’m about
80% annuitized. I’ve been doing managed asset consulting for over
13 years. I’m kind of a quasi-poster boy around here. They want
everyone else to do what I’m doing. All the firms are turning
toward that.”
AH
“You get info about Merrill before we do, which I don’t
mind. I’ll get it one way or another.”
AI
“I really have nothing bad to say about this firm. I mean,
there’s always people who complain, but I’m sure you get
that at every firm.”
AJ
“Branch manager should be replaced; [BM] is
non-supportive.”
AK
“We’re steady, same as it’s been for 23 years. Not a
lot of change.”
AL
(Freedom from pressure): "Right in-between.” (Realistic sales
quotes) "Not a ton, but some." (Payout) “[Payout on fee-based
products is going] "to get better hopefully in the new year. (Benefits)
"Excellent.” (Overall sales support) "Pretty good." (Strategic
focus) "Middle of the road. I don't know, I'm not sure, if they're
wrong or right. I think they're trying to do the right thing." (Image)
"We’ve had a few clients mention [lawsuits over high tech
analysts' recommendations] to me, but I think it will fade away."
AM
(Sales ideas) "Get plenty of that." (Quote and information system)
[Firm spent $1 billion on system platform and is] "too embarrassed to
say the Web platform would work better. [Firm] is supposed to give the
brokers the same Web platform, but "right now, it's a pain" [o work off
the TGA platform]. "The TGA system has tinks in it.” (Account
statements) "Could do some work on that.”
AN
(Payout) "They cut us on smaller accounts and things.. I don't like
that." (Quote and info system) “[TGA system is] "not working very
well. It’s overloaded.”
AO
"Don't have anything to add."
AP
(Account statements) "Very satisfied." (Image) “I like the image,
the bull, the whole positive aspect of being bullish on America. I
think image means a lot.”
Acceptable Use Policy blog comments powered by Disqus












