FIA Urges NASD Committees to Revise Merger

Dec 4, 2006 11:52 PM, By Kevin Burke


         Subscribe in NewsGator Online   Subscribe in Bloglines  

Small broker/dealer firms are trying to slow the proposed merger between the NASD and NYSE Regulation, saying that it’s being pursued too hastily and the consequences are not clear. In a letter to NASD committee members, the Financial Industry Association (FIA), which represents small firms, urged them to sign a petition to slow the merger process. The petition also requests that the NASD provide member firms with more detailed information about the proposed merger and more time to consider its merits.

“It is unfair to force a merger vote down the members’ throats without sufficient information, contracts, impact studies nor a real viable reason to change our voting rights that we have held for 67 years,” John Busacca, president of North American Clearing and FIA founder, wrote in the letter, which was obtained by Registered Rep. Busacca said 25 signatures should be enough to send a strong message to the NASD board of governors. Calls to NASD spokespeople were not returned at press time.

The petition follows FIA director Richard Goble’s appeal to all NASD member firms to vote “no” on the merger. The FIA, a trade group of more than 1,000 small brokerage firms, has been raising a stink over the lack of small-firm representation on the NASD Board of Governors, its National Adjudicatory Council and its District Business Conduct Committee. Wielding the one-firm, one-vote provision of the securities industry bylaws, the FIA has successfully won 21 out of a possible 33 seats on NASD district committees and two seats on the board.

But FIA members fear that approving the merger would signal the death knell for equal representation. Under terms outlined last week, the NASD-NYSE Regulation merger would amend the electoral process for the new SRO’s board. The proposal would let small firms—those with 150 or fewer registered persons—vote only small-firm candidates to the board. At present, NASD firms get one vote per firm for each board representative.

The NASD has argued that the proposed structure affords small firms three seats on the board, as opposed to the one they are guaranteed under the current model. “All we are asking the NASD to do is to slow down and be transparent and open before they take away our right to vote,” Busacca writes.

For more on the FIA’s saber rattling over the proposed merger click here:

http://registeredrep.com/news/small-firms-against-merger/

http://registeredrep.com/mag/finance_sec_chairman_endorses/

http://registeredrep.com/regulatory/finance_fight_club/index.html


Acceptable Use Policy
blog comments powered by Disqus

Current Issue

Registered Rep Cover

Dear Management, Thanks For Nothing.

By Christina Mucciolo
December 1, 2008

In our 18th annual Broker Report Card survey, wirehouse FAs say they are fed up with management ruining their excellent franchises and platforms. Will the great advisor diaspora begin?



browse back issues


Featured Book

Cannon’s Concepts For Professionals: A Complete Library of Essential Financial Concepts 

This reference book was updated for 2008 and now contains over 900 pages of information on essential financial concepts and wealth management strategies for your work with wealthy clients. The book not only contains brief summaries of each topic, but it also contains many useful diagrams and charts that can be used with clients when explaining difficult financial concepts. The information in this book meets current FINRA/NASD guidelines....

Bookstore

Affluent handbook Live Long Live Rich
Mastering High Net Worth Wealth Management team assessment
Back to Top