Citigroup, Wells Fargo Still Battling Over Wachovia

Oct 6, 2008 11:36 AM, By John Churchill


         Subscribe in NewsGator Online   Subscribe in Bloglines  

After a weekend of court battles, Citigroup and Wells Fargo are still battling over who has the right to purchase Wachovia. It now appears the two banks may each get a piece—but without any help from the government.

Citigroup, which was in the middle of hammering out merger plans with Wachovia after agreeing to buy its banking operations for a paltry $2.1 billion, was caught flat-footed by Wells Fargo’s sudden $15-billion interest in Wachovia’s entire business. Citi went to the courts on Friday to extend the deadline for settling on a deal with Wachovia—initially set for today—and was granted until the end of the work week to resolve discussions. However, a New York state appeals court overturned that lower court’s decision, in effect leaving Citigroup until the end of Monday to hammer out a deal. Citigroup, which says Wachovia has reneged on a binding deal, plans to appeal the decision, according to published reports.

That deal included an exclusivity agreement, which would have restricted Wachovia from holding discussions with other suitors. However, the government’s financial rescue package—which Bush signed into law on Friday—includes a provision that makes certain agreements such as these unenforceable. A spokesman for Wells Fargo was quoted in The Wall Street Journal as saying the statutory language “invalidates Wachovia’s claimed exclusivity agreement with Citi.” 

In the meantime, federal regulators are urging Citigroup and Wells Fargo to quit quibbling and to come to some sort of compromise in the interest of market confidence. One rumored plan includes splitting up Wachovia’s bank branches in accordance with the current footprints of the two competing firms—giving the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic branches to Citi, and the Southeast and California branches to Wells Fargo. Wells Fargo would also get Wachovia’s brokerage unit, Wachovia Securities, and its asset management business—neither of which Citigroup was interested in buying.

If Wachovia goes to Wells Fargo, or if they split the firm up between Citigroup and Wells Fargo, the big shift would be in the absence of government help. The FDIC had assured Citigroup it would take on Wachovia’s toxic loan portfolio. That would not be the case if Wells Fargo becomes the buyer of all—or part—of the firm. According to reports, a sworn affidavit by Wachovia CEO Robert Steele indicates the FDIC prefers a marriage with Wells Fargo for this reason.

 



Acceptable Use Policy
blog comments powered by Disqus

Current Issue

Registered Rep Cover

Everything You Know About Asset Allocation Is Wrong

By John Churchill

The unprecedented seems to happen all too frequently in financial markets. Is there something wrong with the way financial advisors build their clients' portfolios? "Post" Modern Portfolio Theory says yes, and it's gaining currency...


browse back issues

Comments

Featured Book

“A Complete Guide to Pooled Income Funds”: As people in the baby-boom generation look toward retirement, they face some of the toughest economic conditions in decades. Traditional approaches to retirement income planning may not be enough to secure your future or your clients’ futures 

This book will show you how Pooled Income Funds work, and how they can help you:

• Create value from dormant assets such as appreciated stock and real estate,
• Guarantee lifetime income for the donor and beneficiaries,
• Retain assets that might otherwise be liquidated due to tax and estate-planning decisions, and
• Build a charitable legacy...

Bookstore

Affluent handbook Live Long Live Rich
Mastering High Net Worth Wealth Management team assessment
Back to Top